Decisions you can defend
Every investment decision arrives with its evidence, its challenge and its approver attached.
Not reconstructed months later — recorded as it happened.
What the accelerator gives you
Configuration on the platform you already run. No new data model, no parallel system of record.
Separation of duties
Requester, reviewer and approver are three people. The system makes a self-approved case visible instead of possible.
Evidence with provenance
Each source carries its tier and its as-of date. A claim with no source is labelled unverified rather than quietly promoted to fact.
History that survives audit
Challenge, dissent and disposition live in the case record. The rework round trip stays visible instead of being overwritten.
One case, four gates
1
Intake
Sponsor, thesis, size, materiality and risk — stated before the work starts.
2
Evidence
Sources attach to the case and carry their tier. The weakest tier is the one that counts.
3
Independent review
A second pair of eyes records the counter-thesis, and any dissent, on the record.
4
Approval
The approver states the disposition and the reasoning. Nothing approves itself.
The AI analyst, and its limits
A research assistant that argues with you — and cannot sign anything.
Read-only by default
The agent drafts, summarises and finds gaps. It does not approve, move stages or reassign reviewers.
Grounded or marked unverified
Facts carry a source and a date. Calculations carry their inputs. Anything else is labelled, not smoothed over.
Inside your permissions
The agent sees exactly what the user sees. Text inside a document is data to analyse, never an instruction to follow.
See it on a real decision case
Bring one recent decision. We will walk it through intake, evidence, review and approval.